AGE/DOSE calc
user-icon
Clinical Trials

Anti-Aging Supplement Rapamycin Increases Lean Mass and Reduces Pain: PEARL Trial Results

One of the most potent anti-aging compounds rapamycin — an FDA-approved drug that inhibits mTOR — increases the lean body mass of older women while reducing their pain.

By Griffin Dean

Key Points: 

  • 10 mg/week of rapamycin increases the lean mass of women by over 5%.  
  • The same dose reduces the pain of women, as measured by a survey. 

Modern human society and medical technology have negated many of natural selection’s effects, allowing more people to live longer. However, an epidemic of poor lifestyle choices, along with the pollutants manufactured by modern society, perpetuate chronic conditions such as lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, and dementia. Thus, while we tend to live longer, many individuals tend to suffer from these chronic conditions, referred to as age-related diseases. 

The goal of translational geoscientists is to test whether aging interventions can counteract age-related diseases and promote longevity in humans. Some of these aging interventions are simply existing drugs that are now being tested against aging, the most popular of which is rapamycin. Originally approved for the prevention of organ transplant rejection, rapamycin has proved to be one of the most potent aging interventions, at least in animal studies.  

A diagram.
(Image: agelessrx.com) Aging Intervention Technologies Can Prolong Lifespan and Healthspan. Now, individuals live to the age of about 80, but many of those years are not spent in wellness. Aging interventions could allow more people to live for 100 years or longer and increase the duration of time lived in wellness, a concept known as healthspan.

Adding to a growing body of clinical evidence revealing rapamycin’s age-intervening effects on humans, scientists at AgelessRx have found that the drug increases lean mass and reduces pain in older women but not older men. Importantly, long-term use of rapamycin taken once per week was shown to be safe for both women and men. 

mTOR Inhibitor Increases Lean Mass and Reduces Pain 

A total of 114 older adults participated in the study: 40 received 5 mg/week of rapamycin, 35 received 10 mg/week, and 39 received a placebo. Adverse effects attributed to rapamycin were limited, gastrointestinal distress being the only complaint more frequently reported in rapamycin groups than the placebo group. 

Lean Mass 

Aging tends to bring adverse changes to the composition of our body, like increased body fat and reduced muscle mass. To assess rapamycin’s effect on these changes, the researchers scanned participants with DXA (Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry), which measures visceral fat, bone mineral density, and lean mass (includes muscle, skin, and connective tissue). No significant changes in bone mineral density or visceral fat were observed in individuals taking rapamycin, but men in the placebo group gained visceral fat. Moreover, the results showed that lean tissue mass was increased in women who took 10 mg of rapamycin per week.

A bar graph.
(Moel et al., 2025) Rapamycin Increases Lean Tissue Mass in Females. Females who took 10 mg/week of rapamycin (black) saw about a 2.5% increase in lean tissue mass after 24 weeks (24W) and about a 5% increase after 48 weeks (48W) compared to their baseline measurement at 0 weeks (not shown). No other groups showed significant changes in lean mass.

Pain

Reduced lean tissue mass is associated with poor quality of life, increased pain, and limited mobility, especially in older women. To evaluate the effect of rapamycin on quality of life, the researchers administered two surveys. Results from the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis) survey, which includes questions pertaining to pain, stiffness, and physical function, showed no significant changes. However, the SF36 (Short Form 36) survey, consisting of 36 quality of life questions, revealed that rapamycin leads to a reduction in perceived pain for the women who took 10 mg of rapamycin per week. 

A bar graph.
(Moel et al., 2025) Rapamycin Reduces Pain in Females. Females who took 10 mg/week of rapamycin (black) saw improved pain scores from the SF36 survey after 24 weeks (24W) and 48 weeks (48W) compared to their baseline measurement at 0 weeks (not shown). No other groups showed significant changes in pain.

Additionally, general health improved in all participants taking 5 but not 10 mg/week of rapamycin, according to the SF36 survey. Moreover, in the 5 mg/week rapamycin group and placebo group, the SF36 survey showed that emotional well-being was improved after 48 weeks. These qualitative measurements will require quantitative evidence to improve validity. 

Can mTOR Inhibitors Improve Lives? 

Rapamycin was first shown to prolong the lifespan of mice in 2009 by inhibiting mTOR, an enzyme that signals cells to grow in the presence of abundant nutrients, especially protein. Inhibiting mTOR has since been shown to prolong the lifespan of mice with varying genetic backgrounds, as well as other organisms. However, whether inhibiting mTOR can prolong the lifespan of humans remains an open question. 

Scientists have just begun to translate their studies of aging mice and other animals to aging humans. In the case of rapamycin, larger studies will help to confirm its efficacy in slowing human aging. In a recent study, off-label users of rapamycin reported,  

“Improvements in health, happiness, brain function, feelings of youthfulness, confidence, calmness, anxiety, and generalized aches and pains. Interestingly, greater than fivefold more rapamycin users agreed with the comment that “family/friends have commented that I look good” than disagreed, suggesting that these perceived self-benefits may also be apparent to others.”

Most off-label users take rapamycin once per week, which is thought to reduce its immunosuppressive effects. This stems from a study showing that either 0.5 mg/day or 5 mg/week of rapamycin enhanced the immune system of older adults. The most frequent dose reported by the off-labels users was 6 mg with some going as high as 20 mg/week. Determining the optimal dose of rapamycin will require further research. 

However, based on the findings of AgelessRx, 10 mg/week could be more effective than 5 mg/week, particularly for women. With that being said, taking 10 mg/week of rapamycin for up to 48 weeks appears to be safe. 

Participants and Dosage

Participants: healthy adults between the ages of 50 and 81

Dosage: 5 mg/week or 10 mg/week of rapamycin

Source

Moel, M., Harinath, G., Lee, V., Nyquist, A., Morgan, S. L., Isman, A., & Zalzala, S. (2025). Influence of rapamycin on safety and healthspan metrics after one year: PEARL trial results. Aging, 17, 10.18632/aging.206235. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.206235

References

Harrison, D. E., Strong, R., Sharp, Z. D., Nelson, J. F., Astle, C. M., Flurkey, K., Nadon, N. L., Wilkinson, J. E., Frenkel, K., Carter, C. S., Pahor, M., Javors, M. A., Fernandez, E., & Miller, R. A. (2009). Rapamycin fed late in life extends lifespan in genetically heterogeneous mice. Nature, 460(7253), 392-395. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08221

Kaeberlein, T. L., Green, A. S., Haddad, G., Hudson, J., Isman, A., Nyquist, A., Rosen, B. S., Suh, Y., Zalzala, S., Zhang, X., Blagosklonny, M. V., An, J. Y., & Kaeberlein, M. (2023). Evaluation of off-label rapamycin use to promote healthspan in 333 adults. GeroScience, 45(5), 2757–2768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-023-00818-1

Mannick, J. B., Morris, M., Hockey, H. P., Roma, G., Beibel, M., Kulmatycki, K., Watkins, M., Shavlakadze, T., Zhou, W., Quinn, D., Glass, D. J., & Klickstein, L. B. (2018). TORC1 inhibition enhances immune function and reduces infections in the elderly. Science translational medicine, 10(449), eaaq1564. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaq1564

Skalsky, A. J., Han, J. J., Abresch, R. T., & McDonald, C. M. (2012). Regional and Whole-Body Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry to Guide Treatment and Monitor Disease Progression in Neuromuscular Disease. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 23(1), 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2011.11.007

00:00:00
00:00:00-0
comment Comments
To The Top